We also know that Twitter’s attack on Trump is not about preventing violence because the firm’s partisan bias showed up way before the storming of the Capitol. Similarly, Twitter does not seem to like the idea that Trump supporters will have a “GIANT VOICE long into the future.” Twitter reads those assurances as the president vowing to continue to stoke doubts about the outcome of the election. To Twitter and others on the left, those words are not complimentary but rather apply only to violent extremists. More insulting is Twitter’s assessment that the words “American Patriots” are directed to those who assaulted the Capitol. They also conjecture that Trump’s absence at the inauguration could be an invitation to violence, since the event would be “a safe target.” They claim Trump’s statement that he will not attend Joe Biden’s inauguration “is being received by a number of his supporters as further confirmation that the election was not legitimate.” It is also interpreted by Twitter as “disavowing” earlier White House messages promising that there would be an orderly transition on January 20. Twitter explains that these tweets must be interpreted in “context” and goes on to examine “the ways in which the president’s statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence…” In other words, Twitter judges are mind-readers. Twitter officials, though, viewing things through a Trump-loathing lens, see something more sinister. These do not seem like unusually combative or threatening posts instead, they are typical tweets from Donald Trump, who has long championed the people who champion him - and who uses lots of capitals and exclamation points to emphasize his message. “To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.” They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!” “The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. In a blog post, the company argued that two tweets from the president occasioned the move: We know this because Twitter’s explanation for permanently suspending Trump from its platform is laughable. It is about stifling dissent and is an insult to every American who cherishes freedom of speech. Twitter’s take-down of President Trump and his supporters from its platform is not about preventing violence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |